# Neural Style Transfer¶

If you happen to be an amateur photographer, you might know something about filters. Filters can alter the color styles of photos to make the background sharper or people’s faces whiter. However, a filter generally can only change one aspect of a photo. To create the ideal photo, you often need to try many different filter combinations. This process is as complex as tuning the hyper-parameters of a model.

In this section, we will discuss how we can use convolution neural networks (CNNs) to automatically apply the style of one image to another image, an operation known as style transfer[1]. Here, we need two input images, one content image and one style image. We use a neural network to alter the content image so that its style mirrors that of the style image. In Figure 9.12, the content image is a landscape photo the author took in Mount Rainier National Part near Seattle. The style image is an oil painting of oak trees in autumn. The output composite image retains the overall shapes of the objects in the content image, but applies the oil painting brushwork of the style image and makes the overall color more vivid.

## Technique¶

Figure 9.13 shows an output of the CNN-based style transfer method. First, we initialize the composite image. For example, we can initialize it as the content image. This composite image is the only variable that needs to be updated in the style transfer process, i.e. the model parameter to be updated in style transfer. Then, we select a pre-trained CNN to extract image features. These model parameters do not need to be updated during training. The deep CNN uses multiple neural layers that successively extract image features. We can select the output of certain layers to use as content features or style features. If we use the structure in Figure 9.13, the pretrained neural network contains three convolutional layers. The second layer outputs the image content features, while the outputs of the first and third layers are used as style features. Next, we use forward propagation (in the direction of the solid lines) to compute the style transfer loss function and backward propagation (in the direction of the dotted lines) to update the model parameter, constantly updating the composite image. The loss functions used in style transfer generally have three parts: 1. Content loss is used to make the composite image approximate the content image as regards content features. 2. Style loss is used to make the composite image approximate the style image in terms of style features. 3. Total variation loss helps reduce the noise in the composite image. Finally, after we finish training the model, we output the style transfer model parameters to obtain the final composite image.

Next, we will perform an experiment to help us better understand the technical details of style transfer.

## Read the Content and Style Images¶

First, we read the content and style images. By printing out the image coordinate axes, we can see that they have different dimensions.

In [1]:

%matplotlib inline
import gluonbook as gb
from mxnet import autograd, gluon, image, init, nd
from mxnet.gluon import model_zoo, nn
import time

gb.set_figsize()
gb.plt.imshow(content_img.asnumpy());

In [2]:

style_img = image.imread('../img/autumn_oak.jpg')
gb.plt.imshow(style_img.asnumpy());


## Preprocessing and Postprocessing¶

Below, we define the functions for image preprocessing and postprocessing. The preprocess function normalizes each of the three RGB channels of the input images and transforms the results to a format that can be input to the CNN. The postprocess function restores the pixel values in the output image to their original values before normalization. Because the image printing function requires that each pixel have a floating point value from 0 to 1, we use the clip function to replace values smaller than 0 or greater than 1 with 0 or 1, respectively.

In [3]:

rgb_mean = nd.array([0.485, 0.456, 0.406])
rgb_std = nd.array([0.229, 0.224, 0.225])

def preprocess(img, image_shape):
img = image.imresize(img, *image_shape)
img = (img.astype('float32') / 255 - rgb_mean) / rgb_std
return img.transpose((2, 0, 1)).expand_dims(axis=0)

def postprocess(img):
img = img[0].as_in_context(rgb_std.context)
return (img.transpose((1, 2, 0)) * rgb_std + rgb_mean).clip(0, 1)


## Extract Features¶

We use the VGG-19 model pre-trained on the ImageNet data set to extract image features[1].

In [4]:

pretrained_net = model_zoo.vision.vgg19(pretrained=True)


To extract image content and style features, we can select the outputs of certain layers in the VGG network. In general, the closer an output is to the input layer, the easier it is to extract image detail information. The farther away an output is, the easier it is to extract global information. To prevent the composite image from retaining too many details from the content image, we select a VGG network layer near the output layer to output the image content features. This layer is called the content layer. We also select the outputs of different layers from the VGG network for matching local and global styles. These are called the style layers. As we mentioned in the “Networks Using Duplicates (VGG)” section, VGG networks have five convolutional blocks. In this experiment, we select the last convolutional layer of the fourth convolutional block as the content layer and the first layer of each block as style layers. We can obtain the indexes for these layers by printing the pretrained_net instance.

In [5]:

style_layers, content_layers = [0, 5, 10, 19, 28], [25]


During feature extraction, we only need to use all the VGG layers from the input layer to the content or style layer nearest the output layer. Below, we build a new network, net, which only retains the layers in the VGG network we need to use. We then use net to extract features.

In [6]:

net = nn.Sequential()
for i in range(max(content_layers + style_layers) + 1):


Given input X, if we simply call the forward computation net(X), we can only obtain the output of the last layer. Because we also need the outputs of the intermediate layers, we need to perform layer-by-layer computation and retain the content and style layer outputs.

In [7]:

def extract_features(X, content_layers, style_layers):
contents = []
styles = []
for i in range(len(net)):
X = net[i](X)
if i in style_layers:
styles.append(X)
if i in content_layers:
contents.append(X)
return contents, styles


Next, we define two functions: The get_contents function obtains the content features extracted from the content image, while the get_styles function obtains the style features extracted from the style image. Because we do not need to change the parameters of the pre-trained VGG model during training, we can extract the content features from the content image and style features from the style image before the start of training. As the composite image is the model parameter that must be updated during style transfer, we can only call the extract_features function during training to extract the content and style features of the composite image.

In [8]:

def get_contents(image_shape, ctx):
content_X = preprocess(content_img, image_shape).copyto(ctx)
contents_Y, _ = extract_features(content_X, content_layers, style_layers)
return content_X, contents_Y

def get_styles(image_shape, ctx):
style_X = preprocess(style_img, image_shape).copyto(ctx)
_, styles_Y = extract_features(style_X, content_layers, style_layers)
return style_X, styles_Y


## Define the Loss Function¶

Next, we will look at the loss function used for style transfer. The loss function includes the content loss, style loss, and total variation loss.

### Content Loss¶

Similar to the loss function used in linear regression, content loss uses a square error function to measure the difference in content features between the composite image and content image. The two inputs of the square error function are both content layer outputs obtained from the extract_features function.

In [9]:

def content_loss(Y_hat, Y):
return (Y_hat - Y).square().mean()


### Style Loss¶

Style loss, similar to content loss, uses a square error function to measure the difference in style between the composite image and style image. To express the styles output by the style layers, we first use the extract_features function to compute the style layer output. Assuming that the output has 1 example, $$c$$ channels, and a height and width of $$h$$ and $$w$$, we can transform the output into the matrix $$\boldsymbol{X}$$, which has $$c$$ rows and $$h \cdot w$$ columns. You can think of matrix $$\boldsymbol{X}$$ as the combination of the $$c$$ vectors $$\boldsymbol{x}_1, \ldots, \boldsymbol{x}_c$$, which have a length of $$hw$$. Here, the vector $$\boldsymbol{x}_i$$ represents the style feature of channel $$i$$. In the Gram matrix of these vectors $$\boldsymbol{X}\boldsymbol{X}^\top \in \mathbb{R}^{c \times c}$$, element $$x_{ij}$$ in row $$i$$ column $$j$$ is the inner product of vectors $$\boldsymbol{x}_i$$ and $$\boldsymbol{x}_j$$. It represents the correlation of the style features of channels $$i$$ and $$j$$. We use this type of Gram matrix to represent the style output by the style layers. You must note that, when the $$h \cdot w$$ value is large, this often leads to large values in the Gram matrix. In addition, the height and width of the Gram matrix are both the number of channels $$c$$. To ensure that the style loss is not affected by the size of these values, we define the gram function below to divide the Gram matrix by the number of its elements, i.e. $$c \cdot h \cdot w$$.

In [10]:

def gram(X):
num_channels, n = X.shape[1], X.size // X.shape[1]
X = X.reshape((num_channels, n))
return nd.dot(X, X.T) / (num_channels * n)


Naturally, the two Gram matrix inputs of the square error function for style loss are taken from the composite image and style image style layer outputs. Here, we assume that the Gram matrix of the style image, gram_Y, has been computed in advance.

In [11]:

def style_loss(Y_hat, gram_Y):
return (gram(Y_hat) - gram_Y).square().mean()


### Total Variance Loss¶

Sometimes, the composite images we learn have a lot of high-frequency noise, particularly bright or dark pixels. One common noise reduction method is total variation denoising. We assume that $$x_{i,j}$$ represents the pixel value at the coordinate $$(i,j)$$, so the total variance loss is:

$\sum_{i,j} \left|x_{i,j} - x_{i+1,j}\right| + \left|x_{i,j} - x_{i,j+1}\right|$

We try to make the values of neighboring pixels as similar as possible.

In [12]:

def tv_loss(Y_hat):
return 0.5 * ((Y_hat[:, :, 1:, :] - Y_hat[:, :, :-1, :]).abs().mean() +
(Y_hat[:, :, :, 1:] - Y_hat[:, :, :, :-1]).abs().mean())


### Loss Function¶

The loss function for style transfer is the weighted sum of the content loss, style loss, and total variance loss. By adjusting these weight hyper-parameters, we can balance the retained content, transferred style, and noise reduction in the composite image according to their relative importance.

In [13]:

style_channels = [net[l].weight.shape[0] for l in style_layers]
content_weight, style_weight, tv_weight = 1, 1e3, 10

def compute_loss(X, contents_Y_hat, styles_Y_hat, contents_Y, styles_Y_gram):
# Calculate the content, style, and total variance losses individually.
contents_l = [content_loss(Y_hat, Y) * content_weight for Y_hat, Y in zip(
contents_Y_hat, contents_Y)]
styles_l = [style_loss(Y_hat, Y) * style_weight for Y_hat, Y in zip(
styles_Y_hat, styles_Y_gram)]
tv_l = tv_loss(X) * tv_weight
# Add up all the losses.
return contents_l, styles_l, tv_l, l


## Create and Initialize the Composite Image¶

In style transfer, the composite image is the only variable that needs to be updated. Therefore, we can define a simple model, GeneratedImage, and treat the composite image as a model parameter. In the model, forward computation only returns the model parameter.

In [14]:

class GeneratedImage(nn.Block):
def __init__(self, img_shape, **kwargs):
super(GeneratedImage, self).__init__(**kwargs)
self.weight = self.params.get('weight', shape=img_shape)

def forward(self):
return self.weight.data()


Next, we define the get_inits function. This function creates a composite image model instance and initializes it to the image X. The Gram matrix for the various style layers of the style image, styles_Y_gram, is computed prior to training.

In [15]:

def get_inits(X, ctx, lr, styles_Y):
gen_img = GeneratedImage(X.shape)
gen_img.initialize(init.Constant(X), ctx=ctx, force_reinit=True)
{'learning_rate': lr})
styles_Y_gram = [gram(Y) for Y in styles_Y]
return gen_img(), styles_Y_gram, trainer


## Training¶

During model training, we constantly extract the content and style features of the composite image and calculate the loss function. Recall our discussion of how synchronization functions force the front end to wait for computation results in the “Asynchronous Computation” section. Because we only call the asscalar synchronization function every 50 epochs, the process may occupy a great deal of memory. Therefore, we call the waitall synchronization function during every epoch.

In [16]:

def train(X, contents_Y, styles_Y, ctx, lr, max_epochs, lr_decay_epoch):
X, styles_Y_gram, trainer = get_inits(X, ctx, lr, styles_Y)
for i in range(max_epochs):
start = time.time()
contents_Y_hat, styles_Y_hat = extract_features(
X, content_layers, style_layers)
contents_l, styles_l, tv_l, l = compute_loss(
X, contents_Y_hat, styles_Y_hat, contents_Y, styles_Y_gram)
l.backward()
trainer.step(1)
nd.waitall()
if i % 50 == 0 and i != 0:
print('epoch %3d, content loss %.2f, style loss %.2f, '
'TV loss %.2f, %.2f sec'
time.time() - start))
if i % lr_decay_epoch == 0 and i != 0:
trainer.set_learning_rate(trainer.learning_rate * 0.1)
print('change lr to %.1e' % trainer.learning_rate)
return X


Next, we start to train the model. First, we set the height and width of the content and style images to 200 by 300 pixels. We use the content image to initialize the composite image.

In [17]:

ctx, image_shape = gb.try_gpu(), (300, 200)
net.collect_params().reset_ctx(ctx)
content_X, contents_Y = get_contents(image_shape, ctx)
style_X, styles_Y = get_styles(image_shape, ctx)
output = train(content_X, contents_Y, styles_Y, ctx, 0.01, 500, 200)

epoch  50, content loss 11.93, style loss 28.25, TV loss 3.13, 0.05 sec
epoch 100, content loss 8.95, style loss 13.66, TV loss 3.32, 0.05 sec
epoch 150, content loss 7.52, style loss 10.23, TV loss 3.40, 0.05 sec
epoch 200, content loss 6.66, style loss 8.28, TV loss 3.47, 0.05 sec
change lr to 1.0e-03
epoch 250, content loss 6.57, style loss 8.09, TV loss 3.48, 0.05 sec
epoch 300, content loss 6.49, style loss 7.93, TV loss 3.49, 0.05 sec
epoch 350, content loss 6.41, style loss 7.76, TV loss 3.49, 0.05 sec
epoch 400, content loss 6.33, style loss 7.59, TV loss 3.50, 0.05 sec
change lr to 1.0e-04
epoch 450, content loss 6.32, style loss 7.57, TV loss 3.50, 0.05 sec


Next, we save the trained composite image. As you can see, the composite image in Figure 9.14 retains the scenery and objects of the content image, while introducing the color of the style image. Because the image is relatively small, the details are a bit fuzzy.

In [18]:

gb.plt.imsave('../img/neural-style-1.png', postprocess(output).asnumpy())


To obtain a clearer composite image, we train the model using a larger image size: $$800 \times 1200$$. We increase the height and width of the image in Figure 9.14 by a factor of four and initialize a larger composite image.

In [19]:

image_shape = (1200, 800)
content_X, content_Y = get_contents(image_shape, ctx)
style_X, style_Y = get_styles(image_shape, ctx)
X = preprocess(postprocess(output) * 255, image_shape)
output = train(X, content_Y, style_Y, ctx, 0.01, 300, 100)
gb.plt.imsave('../img/neural-style-2.png', postprocess(output).asnumpy())

epoch  50, content loss 10.02, style loss 8.29, TV loss 1.38, 0.99 sec
epoch 100, content loss 7.19, style loss 4.89, TV loss 1.50, 1.21 sec
change lr to 1.0e-03
epoch 150, content loss 6.97, style loss 4.74, TV loss 1.50, 0.98 sec
epoch 200, content loss 6.78, style loss 4.61, TV loss 1.50, 1.21 sec
change lr to 1.0e-04
epoch 250, content loss 6.76, style loss 4.60, TV loss 1.51, 0.98 sec


As you can see, each epoch takes more time due to the larger image size. As shown in Figure 9.15, the composite image produced retains more detail due to its larger size. The composite image not only has large blocks of color like the style image, but these blocks even have the subtle texture of brush strokes.

## Summary¶

• The loss functions used in style transfer generally have three parts: 1. Content loss is used to make the composite image approximate the content image as regards content features. 2. Style loss is used to make the composite image approximate the style image in terms of style features. 3. Total variation loss helps reduce the noise in the composite image.
• We can use a pre-trained CNN to extract image features and minimize the loss function to continuously update the composite image.
• We use a Gram matrix to represent the style output by the style layers.

## Problems¶

• How does the output change when you select different content and style layers?
• Adjust the weight hyper-parameters in the loss function. Does the output retain more content or have less noise?
• Further increase the size of the composite image. Does this increase the detail of the output?
• Use different content and style images. Can you create more interesting composite images?

## Reference¶

[1] Gatys, L. A., Ecker, A. S., & Bethge, M. (2016). Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2414-2423).